
AbstractConsider comparing the mean of some quantity to a fixed allowed maximum using an upper confidence limit. If the sample mean of the measurements is below the allowed maximum, but the confidence limit is above it, a widespread practice is to increase the sample size and recalculate the confidence bound. The confidence level of this two‐stage procedure is rarely found correctly, but instead is typically taken to be the nominal confidence level, found as if the final sample size had been specified in advance. In typical settings the correct nominal α should be between the desired P(type I error) and half that value. This paper gives tables for the correct α to use with selected sample sizes, some plots of power curves, and an example of correct two‐stage sampling.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
