
arXiv: 2305.04341
AbstractThe heavy‐tailed behavior of the generalized extreme‐value distribution makes it a popular choice for modeling extreme events such as floods, droughts, heatwaves, wildfires and so forth. However, estimating the distribution's parameters using conventional maximum likelihood methods can be computationally intensive, even for moderate‐sized datasets. To overcome this limitation, we propose a computationally efficient, likelihood‐free estimation method utilizing a neural network. Through an extensive simulation study, we demonstrate that the proposed neural network‐based method provides generalized extreme value distribution parameter estimates with comparable accuracy to the conventional maximum likelihood method but with a significant computational speedup. To account for estimation uncertainty, we utilize parametric bootstrapping, which is inherent in the trained network. Finally, we apply this method to 1000‐year annual maximum temperature data from the Community Climate System Model version 3 across North America for three atmospheric concentrations: 289 ppm (pre‐industrial), 700 ppm (future conditions), and 1400 ppm , and compare the results with those obtained using the maximum likelihood approach.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Statistics - Applications, generalized extreme value distribution, Machine Learning (cs.LG), extreme quantiles, deep neural networks, sufficient statistics, Statistics - Machine Learning, Applications (stat.AP), Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, parameter estimation
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Statistics - Applications, generalized extreme value distribution, Machine Learning (cs.LG), extreme quantiles, deep neural networks, sufficient statistics, Statistics - Machine Learning, Applications (stat.AP), Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, parameter estimation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
