AbstractEcologists increasingly rely on Bayesian methods to fit capture–recapture models. Capture–recapture models are used to estimate abundance while accounting for imperfect detectability in individual‐level data. A variety of implementations exist for such models, including integrated likelihood, parameter‐expanded data augmentation, and combinations of those. Capture–recapture models with latent random effects can be computationally intensive to fit using conventional Bayesian algorithms. We identify alternative specifications of capture–recapture models by considering a conditional representation of the model structure. The resulting alternative model can be specified in a way that leads to more stable computation and allows us to fit the desired model in stages while leveraging parallel computing resources. Our model specification includes a component for the capture history of detected individuals and another component for the sample size which is random before observed. We demonstrate this approach using three examples including simulation and two datasets resulting from capture–recapture studies of different species.