
arXiv: 2211.04682
AbstractThere has been a great deal of recent interest in the development of spatial prediction algorithms for very large datasets and/or prediction domains. These methods have primarily been developed in the spatial statistics community, but there has been growing interest in the machine learning community for such methods, primarily driven by the success of deep Gaussian process regression approaches and deep convolutional neural networks. These methods are often computationally expensive to train and implement and consequently, there has been a resurgence of interest in random projections and deep learning models based on random weights—so called reservoir computing methods. Here, we combine several of these ideas to develop the random ensemble deep spatial (REDS) approach to predict spatial data. The procedure uses random Fourier features as inputs to an extreme learning machine (a deep neural model with random weights), and with calibrated ensembles of outputs from this model based on different random weights, it provides a simple uncertainty quantification. The REDS method is demonstrated on simulated data and on a classic large satellite data set.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, extreme learning machines, random Fourier features, ensemble, deep learning, random features, Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, Statistics - Computation, Computation (stat.CO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, extreme learning machines, random Fourier features, ensemble, deep learning, random features, Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, Statistics - Computation, Computation (stat.CO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
