
arXiv: 1406.2725
An important objective in environmental risk assessment is the estimation of minimum exposure levels called benchmark doses (BMDs), which induce a pre‐specified benchmark response in a target population. Established inferential approaches for BMD analysis typically involve one‐sided, frequentist confidence limits, leading in practice to what are called benchmark dose lower Limits (BMDLs). Appeal to Bayesian modeling and credible limits for building BMDLs is far less developed, however. Indeed, for the few existing forms of Bayesian BMDs, informative prior information is seldom incorporated. We develop reparameterized quantal‐response models that explicitly describe the BMD as a target parameter. Our goal is to obtain an improved estimation and calculation archetype for the BMD and for the BMDL by quantifying prior beliefs representing parameter uncertainty in the statistical model. Implementation is facilitated via a Monte Carlo‐based adaptive Metropolis algorithm to approximate the posterior distribution. An example from environmental carcinogenicity testing illustrates the methodology. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Computer and information sciences, benchmark analysis, quantitative risk assessment, adaptive metropolis algorithm, Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, dose-response analysis, Bayesian modeling, Statistics - Methodology, prior elicitation
Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Computer and information sciences, benchmark analysis, quantitative risk assessment, adaptive metropolis algorithm, Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, dose-response analysis, Bayesian modeling, Statistics - Methodology, prior elicitation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
