
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.725
handle: 2268/28643
Why, how and when does mood influence positive testing, that is, the selection of matching questions, when people actively search for information about others they meet? In four experiments, we demonstrated that happy mood increased positive testing compared to sad mood. Experiment 1 showed that happy participants were more strongly motivated to get along and smooth the interaction to come than sad ones. In addition, evidence was provided by a mediation analysis that happy mood increased the preference for positive testing because of such an improved motivation to get along. Furthermore, Experiment 2 showed that happy participants' preference for positive testing vanished when cognitive resources were limited. The preference for positive testing appeared under happy mood only when the context made salient the goal to get along (Experiments 3 and 4). Together, these results suggest that positive testing in a social-hypothesis testing paradigm may have social values. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, Psychologie sociale, industrielle & organisationnelle, Neurosciences & behavior, mood, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, Social, industrial & organizational psychology, Neurosciences & comportement, stereotype
Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, Psychologie sociale, industrielle & organisationnelle, Neurosciences & behavior, mood, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, Social, industrial & organizational psychology, Neurosciences & comportement, stereotype
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
