
AbstractMarginalized individuals are often caught in a vicious cycle of economic or health problems, a lack of social connection and disempowerment. The present research examines interventions that provide opportunities for social inclusion to break this cycle. Specifically, in two longitudinal field studies, we examined the effect of social inclusion on self‐efficacy and hope in two vulnerable groups, namely, 68 residents in a drug and alcohol rehabilitation centre (Study 1) and 48 marginalized adults taking part in activities organized by a community organization (Study 2). Although somewhat counterintuitive, we hypothesized that social inclusion would affect self‐efficacy by fostering feelings of personal autonomy. The hypothesis was supported by results from both studies revealing an indirect effect from social inclusion via personal autonomy on self‐efficacy and hope. The findings are discussed in relation to how group inclusion may stimulate the development of personal autonomy in disadvantaged adults, an important factor in their recovery and mental health.
3207 Social Psychology, GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY, group-based interventions, hope, RESIDENTIAL CARE, Group-based interventions, SELF-EFFICACY, ADULTS, DEPRESSION, Hope, vulnerable groups in society, personal autonomy, Personal autonomy, IDENTITY, HEALTH, social inclusion, Self-efficacy, SOCIAL SUPPORT, Vulnerable groups in society, self-efficacy, PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED-SATISFACTION, BEHAVIOR, Social inclusion
3207 Social Psychology, GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY, group-based interventions, hope, RESIDENTIAL CARE, Group-based interventions, SELF-EFFICACY, ADULTS, DEPRESSION, Hope, vulnerable groups in society, personal autonomy, Personal autonomy, IDENTITY, HEALTH, social inclusion, Self-efficacy, SOCIAL SUPPORT, Vulnerable groups in society, self-efficacy, PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED-SATISFACTION, BEHAVIOR, Social inclusion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
