
doi: 10.1002/ecy.1597
pmid: 27912027
AbstractLianas are an important component of tropical forests, where they reduce tree growth, fecundity, and survival. Competition for light from lianas may be intense; however, the amount of light that lianas intercept is poorly understood. We used a large‐scale liana‐removal experiment to quantify light interception by lianas in a Panamanian secondary forest. We measured the change in plant area index (PAI) and forest structure before and after cutting lianas (for 4 yr) in eight 80 m × 80 m plots and eight control plots (16 plots total). We used ground‐based LiDARto measure the 3‐dimensional canopy structure before cutting lianas, and then annually for 2 yr afterwards. Six weeks after cutting lianas, mean plotPAIwas 20% higher in control vs. liana removal plots. One yr after cutting lianas, mean plotPAIwas ~17% higher in control plots. The differences between treatments diminished significantly 2 yr after liana cutting and, after 4 yr, trees had fully compensated for liana removal. Ground‐based LiDARrevealed that lianas attenuated light in the upper‐ and middle‐forest canopy layers, and not only in the upper canopy as was previously suspected. Thus, lianas compete with trees by intercepting light in the upper‐ and mid‐canopy of this forest.
580, Tropical Climate, ground-based LiDAR, LAI-2000, Panama, leaf area index (LAI), Forests, Plants, wood area index (WAI), plant area index (PAI), Lianas, light attenuation, competition, secondary tropical forest, Biology, canopy structure
580, Tropical Climate, ground-based LiDAR, LAI-2000, Panama, leaf area index (LAI), Forests, Plants, wood area index (WAI), plant area index (PAI), Lianas, light attenuation, competition, secondary tropical forest, Biology, canopy structure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
