Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ecohydrologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ecohydrology
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Rainfall partitioning in a deciduous forest plot in leafed and leafless periods

Authors: A. Mużyło; P. Llorens; F. Domingo;

Rainfall partitioning in a deciduous forest plot in leafed and leafless periods

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn deciduous forests, it is particularly difficult to understand the factors controlling rainfall partitioning because of the seasonal changes of canopy cover. Moreover, under Mediterranean climate conditions, the marked seasonal variability of rainfall produces highly variable event‐based interception losses making comparison of throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in each season difficult. Rainfall partitioning in a downy oak forest plot located in the Eastern Pyrenees Mountains (NE Spain) was measured over 3 years to study the differences in throughfall, stemflow and interception loss between the leafed and leafless periods and to find out the role of canopy cover and rainfall type in rainfall partitioning. Results show small differences in rainfall partitioning between the leafed and leafless periods, although different rainfall patterns were observed in the two periods, and there were significant changes in canopy cover. Throughfall and stemflow were slightly higher during the leafless period (about 3.6% and 1.7% higher, respectively), and therefore, interception loss was lower (about 5.4% in this period). On an event basis, the leafless period was characterized by lower absolute and relative interception losses than the leafed period. Rainfall was classified in four types by intensity and duration to study the influence of rainfall type on rainfall partitioning in leafed and leafless seasons separately. Rainfall duration was apparently important for all rainfall partitioning components in the leafless period, when stemflow and throughfall were lower and interception loss was enhanced during short events, whereas in the leafed period, no single dominating factor could be found. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    60
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
60
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!