Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ecohydrologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ecohydrology
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Modelling interception loss using the revised Gash model: a case study in a mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest in China

Authors: Lei Su; Changming Zhao; Wenting Xu; Zongqiang Xie;

Modelling interception loss using the revised Gash model: a case study in a mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest in China

Abstract

AbstractInterception loss accounts for a substantial portion of incident precipitation and evapotranspiration in forest ecosystems. Hence, identifying its magnitude is crucial for our understanding of biogeochemical cycling and related hydrological processes. In this study, gross rainfall partitioning into interception loss, throughfall and stemflow were measured and modelled using the revised Gash model for a mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest over the 2014 growing season. Field survey results revealed that interception loss accounted for 14.3% of gross rainfall, while understory rainfall was 84.8% throughfall and 0.9% stemflow. The revised Gash model produced a fairly good agreement between observed and estimated rainfall partitioning. The model underestimated interception loss by only 6.6%, while throughfall and stemflow were also slightly misestimated. Hence the interception loss predictions from the model were robust and reliable for this mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest. As quantified by the model, the vast majority of interception loss occurred as evaporation from the canopy under saturated conditions: 54.9% evaporated during rainfall events, and 38.3% after rainfall ceased. The sensitivity analysis indicated that predictions from the revised Gash model were most affected by changes in canopy storage capacity (S), followed by the mean evaporation rate (Ē) during rainfall events, the mean rainfall rate ( ) and last canopy cover (c). Model predictions were least sensitive to trunk parameters (St and pt). Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!