
AbstractLightning strike is an important ignition source of forest fires. Artificial lightning discharge is a method for studying lightning fires. However, there is not enough data on the ignition of combustible materials caused by artificial lightning discharge. Previous studies on lightning ignition have focused on the heating and ignition effects of long continuing current (LCC), but the function of the impulse current that occurs before the LCC has not been taken into account. In this paper, an impulse current generator of 8/20 μs was used to simulate the ignition effect of impulse current on conifer needle beds. Different current waveforms have different ignition characteristics. We compared five kinds of conifer needle beds. The average of the current needed to ignite the needle bed of Larix gmelinii (Ruprecht) Kuzeneva was the smallest, and the average of the breakdown voltage was the smallest for the needle bed of Pinus massoniana Lamb. The total energy input to the conifer needle beds was fitted as a multiple log‐linear regression model. The heating energy proportion value varies with different bulk densities, current amplitudes, and moisture contents. Based on this data, the heating energy of the impulse current transferred to the needles can be predicted. This information in conjunction with previous research on LCC was used to derive a lightning ignition prediction model of the full waveform for conifer needle beds.
prediction model, conifer needle, Ecology, lightning fire, impulse current, QH540-549.5, Original Research
prediction model, conifer needle, Ecology, lightning fire, impulse current, QH540-549.5, Original Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
