AbstractInvasive plants exert significant ecological impacts on native plants, communities, and ecosystems. However, consistent conclusions regarding how traits of invasive plants, native plants, and their divergences affect invasion dynamics are still lacking. Here, we conducted a pairwise common garden experiment to investigate how invasion was influenced not only by invasive plants but also by native plants, aiming to elucidate the role of invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, and their divergences in invasion processes. Our findings revealed variations in invasive stage depending on the combinations of invasive and native plants. Specifically, native plants such as A. argyi, A. lavandulifolia, and C. album exhibited competitive superiority when co‐occurring with the three invasive plants. S. viridis, A. vestita, and A. annua had competitive superiority when they co‐occurred with E. canadensis, G. quadriradiata, and E. annuus respectively. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the competitive abilities of invasive plants were primarily influenced by factors such as height, diameter, and biomass allocation, while native plants' competitive abilities were mainly affected by diameter, biomass allocation, and function group differences. Moreover, our analysis revealed that invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, their divergences, and their interactions together explained 36.88% of the variation in invasion dynamics, with invasive‐plant traits and the native‐plant traits explaining 10.19% and 6.88%, respectively. In conclusion, the traits of invasive and native plants, along with their divergences, significantly influence interspecific relationships, and influencing the invasive stages. Divergences in competitive strategies between the native plants and invasive plants facilitated invasion processes. Our study not only contributes to understanding the mechanisms underlying invasion, but also provides a scientific foundation for predicting and managing the negative effects of invasive plants.