Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ecological Applicati...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Ecological Applications
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PURE Aarhus University
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Freshwater habitats within the Natura 2000 network

Authors: Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette; id_orcid 0000-0002-3118-344X; Baumane, Marta; id_orcid 0000-0003-0184-9252; Nielsen, Anders; Trolle, Dennis; Branco, Paulo; Borgwardt, Florian; Hering, Daniel; +1 Authors

Freshwater habitats within the Natura 2000 network

Abstract

Abstract Freshwater biodiversity is experiencing dramatic declines. Despite improvements, the trend remains negative, underlining that effective and coordinated initiatives are needed. Protected areas are considered a global cornerstone of biodiversity conservation, and in Europe, the Natura 2000 network plays a central role in safeguarding biodiversity. In the present study, we examine if designated Annex I listed freshwater habitats of the Habitats Directive are sufficiently represented to enable conservation and restoration efforts, as outlined in Article 4 of the European Nature Restoration Law (NRR), to meaningfully contribute to reversing the ongoing decline in freshwater biodiversity. Additionally, we examine whether freshwater habitats are represented across their full natural geographical range, addressing a key spatial component of long‐term persistence, as reflected in the concept of “favorable reference area” as defined in Article 3 of the NRR. We found that freshwater habitats cover 6.2% of the total area of Natura 2000 sites with running waters covering only 0.4%. In addition to a low spatial coverage, the analyses also indicated that several freshwater Annex I habitats are not represented across their full natural geographical range. Based on the obtained results, we therefore argue that a systematic strengthening of the Natura 2000 network is required, with particular emphasis on: (1) expanding the extent of designated freshwater habitat types in‐ and also outside the existing network if necessary to adequately cover freshwater habitats, and (2) identifying and addressing representation gaps across all relevant biogeographic regions. To support this process, we have developed a webtool based on the datasets underlying the analyses, which enables relevant stakeholders including EU institutions, national agencies, and local managers to examine the distribution of freshwater habitats and species protected within the current Natura 2000 network. The webtool can be accessed at https://www.waterwebtools.com/merlin .

Keywords

Habitats Directive, Nature Restoration Law, conservation, freshwater habitats, biodiversity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center