
AbstractSubmarine fans are archives of Earth‐surface processes and change, recording information about the turbidity currents that construct and sculpt them. The volume and recurrence of turbidity currents are of great interest for geohazard assessment, source‐to‐sink modelling, and hydrocarbon reservoir characterization. Yet, such dynamics are poorly constrained. This study integrates data from four Quaternary submarine fans to reconstruct the volume and recurrence of the formative turbidity currents. Calculated event volumes vary over four orders of magnitude (105 to 109 m3), whereas recurrence intervals vary less, from 50 to 650 years. The calculated turbidity‐current‐event volume magnitudes appear to be related to slope position and basin confinement. Intraslope‐fan deposits have small event volumes (ca 106 m3) while ponded‐fan deposits have very large event volumes (108 to 109 m3). Deposits in non‐ponded, base‐of‐slope environments have intermediate values (107 to 108 m3). Sediment bypass in intraslope settings and flow trapping in ponded basins likely account for these differences. There seems to be no clear relationship between event recurrence and basin confinement. Weak scaling exists between event volume and source‐area characteristics, but sediment storage in fluvial and/or intraslope transfer zones likely complicates these relationships. The methodology and results presented here are also applied to reconstruct the time of deposition of ancient submarine‐fan deposits of the Tanqua Karoo basin, South Africa. The volume and recurrence of submarine‐fan‐building turbidity currents form intermediate values between values measured in submarine canyons and channels (<105 m3 and <101 years) and on abyssal plains (>108 m3 and >103 years), indicating that small, frequent flows originating in submarine canyons often die out prior to reaching the fan, while rare and very large flows mostly bypass the fan and deposit sediment on the abyssal plain. This partitioning of flow volume and recurrence along the submarine sediment‐routing system provides valuable insights for better constraining geohazards, hydrocarbon resources and the completeness of the stratigraphic record.
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Sedimentology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics|Analysis, Stratigraphy, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geomorphology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Applied Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Stratigraphy, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geomorphology, FOS: Mathematics, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Sedimentology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geology, Applied Mathematics, Geology, Geomorphology, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Sedimentology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Stratigraphy, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics|Analysis, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics, Earth Sciences, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Applied Mathematics, Analysis, Mathematics
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Sedimentology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics|Analysis, Stratigraphy, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geomorphology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Applied Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Stratigraphy, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geomorphology, FOS: Mathematics, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Sedimentology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geology, Applied Mathematics, Geology, Geomorphology, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Sedimentology, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Stratigraphy, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics|Analysis, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Mathematics, Earth Sciences, EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Applied Mathematics, Analysis, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
