
AbstractFor using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported values. Here we introduce an Open Source CTC scoring tool to enable comparison of different reviewers and facilitate the reach of a consensus on assigning objects as CTCs. One hundred images generated from two different platforms were used to assess concordance between 15 reviewers and an expert panel. Large differences were observed between reviewers in assigning objects as CTCs urging the need for computer recognition of CTCs. A demonstration of a deep learning approach on the 100 images showed the promise of this technique for future CTC enumeration. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
570, Consensus, Lung Neoplasms, UT-Hybrid-D, 610, Cell Count, Agreement, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, definition, Humans, experts, scoring, deep learning, Flow Cytometry, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, CTC, reviewers, consensus, CTC Technologies and Tools, ground truth
570, Consensus, Lung Neoplasms, UT-Hybrid-D, 610, Cell Count, Agreement, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, definition, Humans, experts, scoring, deep learning, Flow Cytometry, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, CTC, reviewers, consensus, CTC Technologies and Tools, ground truth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
