
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22652
pmid: 25728685
AbstractAutophagy dysregulation has been implicated in numerous diseases and many therapeutic agents are known to modulate this pathway. Therefore, the ability to accurately monitor autophagy is critical to understanding its role in the pathogenesis and treatment of many diseases. Recently an imaging flow cytometry method measuring colocalization of microtubule associated protein 1B light chain 3 (LC3) and lysosomal signals via Bright Detail Similarity (BDS) was proposed which enabled evaluation of autophagic processing. However, since BDS only evaluates colocalization of LC3 and lysosomal signals, the number of autophagy organelles was not taken into account. We found that in cells classified as having Low BDS, there was a large degree of variability in accumulation of autophagosomes. Therefore, we developed a new approach wherein BDS was combined with number of LC3+ puncta, which enabled us to distinguish between cells having very few autophagy organelles versus cells with accumulation of autophagosomes or autolysosomes. Using this method, we were able to distinguish and quantify autophagosomes and autolysosomes in breast cancer cells cultured under basal conditions, with inhibition of autophagy using chloroquine, and with induction of autophagy using amino acid starvation. This technique yields additional insight into autophagy processing making it a useful supplement to current techniques. © 2015 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry
Green Fluorescent Proteins, Chloroquine, Flow Cytometry, Cell Tracking, Cell Line, Tumor, Phagosomes, Autophagy, Humans, Lysosomes, Microtubule-Associated Proteins
Green Fluorescent Proteins, Chloroquine, Flow Cytometry, Cell Tracking, Cell Line, Tumor, Phagosomes, Autophagy, Humans, Lysosomes, Microtubule-Associated Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
