
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20157
pmid: 15973698
AbstractBackground:The jet‐in‐air cell sorters currently available are not very suitable for sorting potentially biohazardous material under optimal conditions because they do not protect operators and samples as recommended in the guidelines for safe biotechnology. To solve this problem we have adapted a cell sorting system to a special biosafety cabinet that satisfies the requirements for class II cabinets. With aid of this unit, sorting can be performed in conformance with the recommendations for biosafety level 2.Methods:After integrating a modified fluorescence‐activated cell sorter (FACS) Vantage into a special biosafety cabinet, we investigated the influence of the laminar air flow (LAF) inside the cabinet on side stream stability and the analytical precision of the cell sorter. In addition to the routine electronic counting of microparticles, we carried out tests on the containment of aerosols, using T4 bacteriophage as indicators, to demonstrate the efficiency of the biosafety cabinet for sorting experiments performed under biosafety level 2 conditions.Results:The experiments showed that LAF, which is necessary to build up sterile conditions in a biosafety cabinet, does not influence the conditions for side stream stability or the analytical precision of the FACS Vantage cell sorting system. In addition, tests performed to assess aerosol containment during operation of the special biosafety cabinet demonstrated that the cabinet‐integrated FACS Vantage unit (CIF) satisfies the conditions for class II cabinets. In the context of gene transfer experiments, the CIF facility was used to sort hematopoietic progenitor cells under biosafety level 2 conditions.Conclusions:The newly designed biosafety cabinet offers a practical modality for improving biosafety for operators and samples during cell sorting procedures. It can thus also be used for sorting experiments with genetically modified organisms in conformance with current biosafety regulations and guidelines. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Aerosols, Air Movements, Safety Management, Organisms, Genetically Modified, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Antigens, CD34, Guidelines as Topic, Cell Separation, Equipment Design, Containment of Biohazards, Environment, Controlled, Flow Cytometry, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Hazardous Substances, Retroviridae, Transduction, Genetic, Cytidine Deaminase, Equipment Contamination, Humans, Occupational Health
Aerosols, Air Movements, Safety Management, Organisms, Genetically Modified, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Antigens, CD34, Guidelines as Topic, Cell Separation, Equipment Design, Containment of Biohazards, Environment, Controlled, Flow Cytometry, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Hazardous Substances, Retroviridae, Transduction, Genetic, Cytidine Deaminase, Equipment Contamination, Humans, Occupational Health
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
