Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Crop Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Crop Science
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Improving the identification of haploid maize seeds using convolutional neural networks

Authors: Felipe Sabadin; Giovanni Galli; Ronaldo Borsato; Raysa Gevartosky; Gabriela Romêro Campos; Roberto Fritsche‐Neto;

Improving the identification of haploid maize seeds using convolutional neural networks

Abstract

AbstractA critical step toward the success of the doubled haploid (DH) technique is the haploid identification within induction crosses. The R1‐nj marker is the principal mechanism employed in this task enabling the selection of haploids at the seed stage. Although it seems easy to identify haploid seeds, this task is performed manually by visual classification, which becomes an inefficient process in terms of time and labor. Also, differential phenotypic expression of the R1‐nj marker results in high rates of false positives among haploid seeds. For the first time, an image‐based convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to identify true positives among putative haploid seeds. The experiment was conducted using 3,000 maize (Zea mays L.) seeds from induction crosses classified as haploid (1,000), diploid (1,000), and inhibited (1,000) class. Images were taken from each seed, and then seeds were planted in the field to confirm their ploidy. For putative haploids (R1‐nj phenotype), the classification accuracy on average was 94.39%, 97.07% for the haploid class, and 91.71% for the diploid class. However, the CNN model was unable to distinguish true haploid seeds among the putative haploid class, which indicates that CNN did not recognize different patterns between them. Finally, we provided a highly accurate and trained CNN model to the scientific community to classify haploid maize seeds via R1‐nj, which can support maize breeders to optimize DH pipelines, mainly for small breeding programs with limited resources.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!