
doi: 10.1002/col.70007
ABSTRACT We measured luminance contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) of four subjects by using Gabor stimuli up to 56°, 49°, 84°, and 63° in the nasal, superior, temporal, and inferior directions, respectively, of the left‐eye visual field. The present measured data covered a broader range of eccentricity than those in the previous studies. The findings of this study align with previous research in terms of anisotropy in eccentricity directions. In addition, these reveal an intriguing pattern: a slight decrease in contrast sensitivity with increasing eccentricity at near eccentricity, followed by a rapid decline at eccentricity and low spatial frequency. This pattern is not predicted by 10 CSF models proposed by previous studies based on measurements in narrow eccentricity ranges. Those CSF models showed higher sensitivities at far eccentricity in comparison with our measured data. This discrepancy suggests that the CSF models with a single term for eccentricity proposed by previous studies were insufficient to fit measured data up to far eccentricities.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
