<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1002/col.20698
AbstractThis study aims to explore the relation of affective feelings to typefaces and colors. Two experiments were conducted. The first experiment used 74 typefaces to investigate the affective feelings of typefaces. The second experiment used 72‐colored typefaces to investigate the influence of both colors and typefaces on affective feelings. The results showed the affective feelings for typefaces can be described by appearance and evaluation factors. The characteristic of serif and the print/handwriting look were found to be the criteria classifying the typefaces. Furthermore, the regression models for eight affective feelings were developed. These models showed that the typefaces were more influential than colors on the feelings of “complex–simple,” “beautiful–ugly,” “luxury–plain,” “active–passive,” “causal–regular,” and “like–dislike.” In comparison with typeface, color was more influential on “friendly–serious” and “soft–hard” feelings. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 2012
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |