
doi: 10.1002/cjs.11679
Expectile regression is a useful alternative to conditional mean and quantile regression for characterizing a conditional response distribution, especially when the distribution is asymmetric or when its tails are of interest. In this article, we propose a class of scalar‐on‐function linear expectile regression models where the functional slope parameter is assumed to reside in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). Our approach addresses numerous drawbacks to existing estimators based on functional principal components analysis (FPCA), which make implicit assumptions about RKHS eigenstructure. We show that our proposed estimator can achieve an optimal rate of convergence by establishing asymptotic minimax lower and upper bounds on the prediction error. Under this framework, we propose a flexible implementation based on the alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm. Simulation studies and an analysis of real‐world neuroimaging data validate our methodology and theoretical findings and, furthermore, suggest its superiority over FPCA‐based approaches in numerous settings.
Functional data analysis, expectile regression, QA276, Nonparametric regression and quantile regression, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, functional data analysis, heteroscedasticity
Functional data analysis, expectile regression, QA276, Nonparametric regression and quantile regression, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, functional data analysis, heteroscedasticity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
