
doi: 10.1002/cjs.11295
AbstractThis article discusses a novel approach for testing for additivity in non‐parametric regression. We represent the model using a linear mixed model framework and equivalently rewrite the original testing problem as testing for a subset of zero variance components. We propose two testing procedures: the restricted likelihood ratio test and the generalizedFtest. We develop the finite sample null distribution of the restricted likelihood ratio test and generalizedFtest using the spectral decomposition of the restricted likelihood ratio and the residual sum of squares, respectively. The null distribution is non‐standard and we provide a fast algorithm to simulate from the null distribution of the tests. We show, through numerical investigation, that the proposed testing procedures outperform the available alternatives and apply the methods to a diabetes data set.The Canadian Journal of Statistics44: 445–462; 2016 © 2016 Statistical Society of Canada
Generalized linear models (logistic models), diabetes, testing for additivity, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, linear mixed models, testing for variance components, restricted likelihood ratio test, generalized \(F\) test, Nonparametric regression and quantile regression, non-parametric regression, Nonparametric hypothesis testing
Generalized linear models (logistic models), diabetes, testing for additivity, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, linear mixed models, testing for variance components, restricted likelihood ratio test, generalized \(F\) test, Nonparametric regression and quantile regression, non-parametric regression, Nonparametric hypothesis testing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
