
doi: 10.1002/cjs.11280
AbstractPrediction of a cause‐specific cumulative incidence function (CIF) for data containing competing risks is of primary interest to clinicians when making treatment decisions for patients given their prognostic characteristics. The Fine–Gray regression model is widely used to incorporate multiple prognostic factors, yet it is not applicable when the assumption of proportional subdistribution hazards (PSH) does not hold. In this study we investigate the properties of the partial‐likelihood estimator from the Fine–Gray model under non‐proportionality and propose a robust risk prediction procedure that is not sensitive to the assumption and is more favourable in practice because it bypasses the complicated modelling of time‐varying covariate effects. We evaluate the prediction performance of our procedure in simulations and demonstrate an application in predicting the absolute risk of locoregional recurrence for breast cancer patients, given a set of prognostic factors in which not all of them satisfy the PSH assumption. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 44: 127–141; 2016 © 2016 Statistical Society of Canada
non-proportionality, Brier score, prediction models, Estimation in survival analysis and censored data, inverse probability censoring weight, cumulative incidence function, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, competing risks
non-proportionality, Brier score, prediction models, Estimation in survival analysis and censored data, inverse probability censoring weight, cumulative incidence function, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, competing risks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
