
doi: 10.1002/cjce.24672
Abstract Oscillatory baffled reactors (OBRs) can perform high‐intensity mixing under low power consumption, and thus are viable replacements for stirred tank reactors in biological, chemical, and polymer processes. This study simulated the flow inside a moving baffle OBR with single orifice baffles using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The effect of operational and geometrical parameters along with the fluid density and viscosity on average power consumption and maximum power consumption was investigated, and appropriate correlations for both average and maximum power consumption were obtained. It was found that average and maximum power consumption are independent of viscosity, and amplitude has a greater impact on maximum power consumption than on average power consumption. These correlations were then compared with available power models (that showed an acceptable level of discrepancies) in the literature. Lower power consumption values obtained from CFD results compared to those obtained from quasi‐steady state model (QSM) and eddy enhancement model (EEM) models (developed for stationary baffle OBRs) under the same operating conditions, along with higher axial dispersion of moving baffle OBRs compared to stationary baffle types under the same operating conditions, indicated that a moving baffle OBR is a more efficient mixing device than a stationary baffle OBR in terms of power consumption. The ratio of average power consumption to maximum power consumption was proven to be independent of the type of fluid and a very weak function of oscillation frequency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
