
doi: 10.1002/cem.3433
Abstract In modern data analysis, there is an increasing availability of datasets with numerous variables. Linear models that deal with abundant predictor variables often have poor performance because they tend to produce large variances. As well known, partial least squares (PLS) regression standouts because it is serviceable even if the number of variables far exceeds the number of samples. However, PLS, at its core, is a least‐squares method based on latent space, which is spanned by the components extracted from the original predictors. Hence, it is sensitive to outliers. In this study, incorporating the idea of least median of squares, we propose a new robust PLS method, namely, partial least median of squares (PLMS) regression. Unlike most of the robust counterparts, we solve the PLMS problem via modern optimization rather than a heuristic process or a reweighting strategy. A classical PLS method and two of the most efficient robust PLS methods are compared with our method. Results on simulations and two real‐world data sets demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our approach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
