
doi: 10.1002/ca.20777
pmid: 19280654
AbstractMany studies around the world have looked at the stresses placed on medical students by cadaveric dissection. Although these studies have linked the use of cadavers in medical teaching to stress, some investigations have suggested an association with severe psychological stress and even post‐traumatic stress disorder. This study assessed the attitudes of medical and biomedical sciences students in an Irish medical school towards cadaveric dissection by recording, through a questionnaire, their perceptions and experience before initial exposure to dissection and subsequently examining their attitudes after the first dissection and after 9 weeks. Student attitudes towards the dissecting room remained consistently positive for the duration of the study with only a minority of respondents reporting negative symptoms. Pre‐existing attitudes to the idea of dissection were unaffected by exposure and subsequent continuous experience of dissection. The majority of students in this study did not find the dissecting room experience stressful, and considered time spent in the dissecting room valuable. However, the proportion of students with negative experiences in the dissecting room was higher than has been reported in previous studies. Many respondents felt they could be better prepared for the dissecting room experience, indicating an increasing requirement for effective preparatory programmes. Clin. Anat. 22:386–391, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Attitude to Death, Students, Medical, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dissection, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Adaptation, Psychological, Cadaver, Humans, Female, Anatomy, Ireland, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Male, Attitude to Death, Students, Medical, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dissection, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Adaptation, Psychological, Cadaver, Humans, Female, Anatomy, Ireland, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 93 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
