
doi: 10.1002/btpr.1609
pmid: 22848048
AbstractTrehalose (α‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1,1)‐α‐D‐glucopyranoside) is widely used in the food industry, thanks to its protective effect against freezing and dehydration. Analogs of trehalose have the additional benefit that they are not digested and thus do not contribute to our caloric intake. Such trehalose analogs can be produced with the enzyme trehalose phosphorylase, when it is applied in the reverse, synthetic mode. Despite the enzyme's broad acceptor specificity, its catalytic efficiency for alternative monosaccharides is much lower than for glucose. For galactose, this difference is shown here to be caused by a lower Km whereas the kcat for both substrates is equal. Consequently, increasing the affinity was attempted by enzyme engineering of the trehalose phosphorylase from Thermoanaerobacter brockii, using both semirational and random mutagenesis. While a semirational approach proved unsuccessful, high‐throughput screening of an error‐prone PCR library resulted in the discovery of three beneficial mutations that lowered Km two‐ to three‐fold. In addition, it was found that mutation of these positions also leads to an improved catalytic efficiency for mannose and fructose, suggesting their involvement in acceptor promiscuity. Combining the beneficial mutations did not further improve the affinity, and even resulted in a decreased catalytic activity and thermostability. Therefore, enzyme variant R448S is proposed as new biocatalyst for the industrial production of lactotrehalose (α‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1,1)‐α‐D‐galactopyranoside). © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2012
Kinetics, Bacterial Proteins, Glucosyltransferases, Biocatalysis, Trehalose, Thermoanaerobacter, Protein Engineering, Substrate Specificity
Kinetics, Bacterial Proteins, Glucosyltransferases, Biocatalysis, Trehalose, Thermoanaerobacter, Protein Engineering, Substrate Specificity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
