
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This review examines the history, incidence, aetiology and pathology of recurrent carotid stenosis, and assesses the methods and results of managing patients with this condition.Over 200 references were retrieved from Medline from 1966 to 1996. Data were collected which reported the incidence, timing, method of diagnosis, follow-up, percentage of patients with symptoms and the indications for revisional surgery. The stroke rate and operative mortality rate following revisional carotid surgery were also recorded.The overall incidence of symptomatic recurrent stenosis ranged from 0 to 8.2 per cent, with a symptomless recurrence rate between 1.3 and 37 per cent. Forty-three (78 per cent) of 55 studies indicated that revisional surgery was performed on patients with symptoms; only 21 (38 per cent) of 55 studies indicated that operations were carried out on asymptomatic patients. The stroke rate and mortality rate after 511 revisional procedures were 3.9 and 1.0 per cent respectively.Symptomatic recurrent stenosis is rare but some patients may benefit from revisional surgery. Surgery for symptomless carotid restenosis should be considered only if a multicentre trial can demonstrate clear benefit in terms of patient survival or stroke reduction.
Adult, Male, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Recurrence, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Carotid Artery, Internal, Aged
Adult, Male, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Recurrence, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Carotid Artery, Internal, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 139 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
