
AbstractThe estimation of individual values (marks) in a finite population of units (e.g., trees) scattered onto a survey region is considered under 3P sampling. For each unit, the mark is estimated by means of an inverse distance weighting interpolator. Conditions ensuring the design‐based consistency of maps are considered under 3P sampling. A computationally simple mean squared error estimator is adopted. Because 3P sampling involves the prediction of marks for each unit in the population, prediction errors rather than marks can be interpolated. Then, marks are estimated by the predictions plus the interpolated errors. If predictions are good, prediction errors are more smoothed than raw marks so that the procedure is likely to better meet consistency requirements. The purpose of this paper is to provide theoretical and empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the interpolation based on prediction errors to prove that the proposed strategy is a tool of general validity for mapping forest stands.
330, consistency, Ecology, Statistics as Topic, inverse distance weighting interpolation, simulation study, prediction error interpolation, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Trees, consistency; inverse distance weighting interpolation; marked finite populations; prediction error interpolation; simulation study, marked finite population, marked finite populations
330, consistency, Ecology, Statistics as Topic, inverse distance weighting interpolation, simulation study, prediction error interpolation, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Trees, consistency; inverse distance weighting interpolation; marked finite populations; prediction error interpolation; simulation study, marked finite population, marked finite populations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
