
pmid: 23423821
The paper introduces a general approach to constructing mixture‐based gatekeeping procedures in multiplicity problems with two or more families of hypotheses. Mixture procedures serve as extensions of and overcome limitations of some previous gatekeeping approaches such as parallel gatekeeping and tree‐structured gatekeeping. This paper offers a general theory of mixture procedures constructed from nonparametric (p‐value based) to parametric (normal theory based) procedures and studies their properties. It is also shown that the mixture procedure for parallel gatekeeping is equivalent to the multistage gatekeeping procedure. A clinical trial example is used to illustrate the mixture approach and the implementation of mixture procedures.
multiple comparisons, Clinical Trials as Topic, Gatekeeping, Endpoint Determination, Hypertension, Pulmonary, logical restrictions, Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, familywise error rate, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Bonferroni procedure, Humans, closed procedures, Dunnett procedure
multiple comparisons, Clinical Trials as Topic, Gatekeeping, Endpoint Determination, Hypertension, Pulmonary, logical restrictions, Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, familywise error rate, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Bonferroni procedure, Humans, closed procedures, Dunnett procedure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
