
pmid: 19067331
AbstractWe consider parametric distributions intended to model heterogeneity in population size estimation, especially parametric stochastic abundance models for species richness estimation. We briefly review (conditional) maximum likelihood estimation of the number of species, and summarize the results of fitting 7 candidate models to frequency‐count data, from a database of >40000 such instances, mostly arising from microbial ecology. We consider error estimation, goodness‐of‐fit assessment, data subsetting, and other practical matters. We find that, although the array of candidate models can be improved, finite mixtures of a small number of components (point masses or simple diffuse distributions) represent a promising direction. Finally we consider the connections between parametric models for abundance and incidence data, again noting the usefulness of finite mixture models. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Models, Statistical, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Biodiversity, Epidemiologic Methods, Models, Biological, Ecosystem
Models, Statistical, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Biodiversity, Epidemiologic Methods, Models, Biological, Ecosystem
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
