
pmid: 17240654
AbstractThere has been growing interest, when comparing an experimental treatment with an active control with respect to a binary outcome, in allowing the non‐inferiority margin to depend on the unknown success rate in the control group. It does not seem universally recognized, however, that the statistical test should appropriately adjust for the uncertainty surrounding the non‐inferiority margin. In this paper, we inspect a naive procedure that treats an “observed margin” as if it were fixed a priori, and explain why it might not be valid. We then derive a class of tests based on the delta method, including the Wald test and the score test, for a smooth margin. An alternative derivation is given for the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic, again for a smooth margin. We discuss the asymptotic behavior of these tests when applied to a piecewise smooth margin. A simple condition on the margin function is given which allows the likelihood ratio test to carry over to a piecewise smooth margin using the same critical value as for a smooth margin. Simulation experiments are conducted, under a smooth margin and a piecewise linear margin, to evaluate the finite‐sample performance of the asymptotic tests studied. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Biometry, Models, Statistical, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Sample Size, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Computer Simulation, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Algorithms
Biometry, Models, Statistical, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Sample Size, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Computer Simulation, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
