
In this paper we derive explicit expressions for the elements of the exact Fisher information matrix of the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution. We show that exact calculation is based on the beta-binomial probability function rather than that of the Dirichlet-multinomial and this makes the exact calculation quite easy. The exact results are expected to be useful for the calculation of standard errors of the maximum likelihood estimates of the beta-binomial parameters and those of the Dirichlet-multinomial parameters for data that arise in practice in toxicology and other similar fields. Standard errors of the maximum likelihood estimates of the beta-binomial parameters and those of the Dirichlet-multinomial parameters, based on the exact and the asymptotic Fisher information matrix based on the Dirichlet distribution, are obtained for a set of data from Haseman and Soares (1976), a dataset from Mosimann (1962) and a more recent dataset from Chen, Kodell, Howe and Gaylor (1991). There is substantial difference between the standard errors of the estimates based on the exact Fisher information matrix and those based on the asymptotic Fisher information matrix.
Male, 570, Likelihood Functions, Biometry, Models, Statistical, Beta-binomial distribution, Mutagenicity Tests, Exact Fisher information matrix, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Maximum likelihood estimates, Mice, Pregnancy, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Animals, Hydroxyurea, Pollen, Approximate Fisher information matrix, Female, Dirichlet-multinomial distribution, Statistical Distributions
Male, 570, Likelihood Functions, Biometry, Models, Statistical, Beta-binomial distribution, Mutagenicity Tests, Exact Fisher information matrix, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Maximum likelihood estimates, Mice, Pregnancy, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Animals, Hydroxyurea, Pollen, Approximate Fisher information matrix, Female, Dirichlet-multinomial distribution, Statistical Distributions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
