
doi: 10.1002/asmb.2586
AbstractWe address the problems of extracting information generated by one dimensional periodic point processes. These problems arise in numerous situations, from astronomy and biomedical applications to reliability and quality control and signal processing. We divide our analysis into two cases, namely single and then multiple source(s). We wish to extract the fundamental period of the generator(s), and, in the second case, to deinterleave the processes. We present two algorithms, designed to work on all one dimensional periodic processes, but in particular on sparse datasets where other procedures break down. The first algorithm works on data from single period processes, computing an estimate of the underlying period. It is extremely computationally efficient and straightforward, and works on all single period processes, but in particular on sparse datasets where others break down. Its justification, however, rests on some deep mathematics, including a probabilistic interpretation of the Riemann zeta function. We then build upon this procedure to analyze data from multiple periodic processes. This second procedure relies on the Riemann zeta function, Weyl's equidistribution theorem, and Wiener's periodogram.
ergodic theory, Computational methods for problems pertaining to probability theory, Riemann zeta function, Point processes (e.g., Poisson, Cox, Hawkes processes), periodic processes, General theory of distribution modulo \(1\), Weyl's equidistribution theorem, point processes
ergodic theory, Computational methods for problems pertaining to probability theory, Riemann zeta function, Point processes (e.g., Poisson, Cox, Hawkes processes), periodic processes, General theory of distribution modulo \(1\), Weyl's equidistribution theorem, point processes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
