
ObjectiveMany studies suggest a strong familial component to fibromyalgia (FM). However, those studies have nearly all been confined to individuals with primary FM, i.e., FM without any other accompanying disorder. The current 2011 and 2016 criteria for diagnosing FM construct a score using a combination of the number of painful body sites and the severity of somatic symptoms (FM score). This study was undertaken to estimate the genetic heritability of the FM score across sex and age groups to identify subgroups of individuals with greater heritability, which may help in the design of future genetic studies.MethodsWe collected data on 26,749 individuals of European ancestry undergoing elective surgery at the University of Michigan (Michigan Genomics Initiative study). We estimated the single‐nucleotide polymorphism–based heritability of FM score by age and sex categories using genome‐wide association study data and a linear mixed‐effects model.ResultsOverall, the FM score had an estimated heritability of 13.9% (SE 2.9%) (P = 1.6 × 10−7). Estimated FM score heritability was highest in individuals ≤50 years of age (23.5%; SE 7.9%) (P = 3.0 ×10−4) and lowest in individuals >60 years of age (7.5%; SE 8.1%) (P = 0.41). These patterns remained the same when we analyzed FM as a case–control phenotype. Even though women had an ~30% higher average FM score than men across age categories, FM score heritability did not differ significantly by sex.ConclusionYounger individuals appear to have a much stronger genetic component to the FM score than older individuals. Older individuals may be more likely to have what was previously called “secondary FM.” Regardless of the cause, these results have implications for future genetic studies of FM and associated conditions.
Adult, Male, Fibromyalgia, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Rheumatology, Health Sciences, Humans, Female, Aged
Adult, Male, Fibromyalgia, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Rheumatology, Health Sciences, Humans, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
