Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archaeological Prosp...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Archaeological Prospection
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Archaeological Prospection
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ethical challenges in the practice of remote sensing and geophysical archaeology

Authors: Dylan S. Davis; Matthew C. Sanger;

Ethical challenges in the practice of remote sensing and geophysical archaeology

Abstract

Within archaeology, concern over ethics has become a center point of debate, particularly in terms of cultural patrimony, repatriation, intellectual property rights, and the display of sensitive items. Most of these debates center around objects, information, and narratives acquired and built through archaeological excavations and antiquarian collections, while far less attention has been paid to projects that rely on remote sensing technologies. Remote sensing technologies are typically viewed as non-destructive, non-invasive, and resulting in non-sensitive data. As such, the ability to record objects remotely, be that from space, the air, or the ground, has resulted in a massive expansion of archaeological data over the past several decades, and the use of these techniques has grown considerably since the turn of the 21st century. With this massive expansion in use, researchers are increasingly considering the broader social, political, economic, and cultural ramifications of using remote sensing technologies and therefore, how they can best be deployed in an ethical manner. Despite a recent increase in studies highlighting the ethical dilemmas within archaeological remote sensing, the conversation on this topic is still underwhelming. For this reason, among many others, we felt that a formalized discussion of these ethical issues was overdue. In what follows, we will present several major themes of the articles contained in this special issue. Next, we will synthesize the articles contained in this issue. Finally, we will discuss some future goals for remote sensing and geophysical archaeology, particularly detailing what we see as necessary steps for the subdiscipline as it matures and takes its ethical responsibilities seriously.

Keywords

remote sensing, geophysical archaeology, best research practices, archaeology, ethics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 65
    download downloads 26
  • 65
    views
    26
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
19
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
65
26
Green
hybrid