
AbstractPremiseTo improve forest conservation monitoring, we developed a protocol to automatically count and identify the seeds of plant species with minimal resource requirements, making the process more efficient and less dependent on human operators.Methods and ResultsSeeds from six North American conifer tree species were separated from leaf litter and imaged on a flatbed scanner. In the most successful species‐classification approach, an ImageJ macro automatically extracted measurements for random forest classification in the software R. The method allows for good classification accuracy, and the same process can be used to train the model on other species.ConclusionsThis protocol is an adaptable tool for efficient and consistent identification of seed species or potentially other objects. Automated seed classification is efficient and inexpensive, making it a practical solution that enhances the feasibility of large‐scale monitoring projects in conservation biology.
seed classification, QH301-705.5, Botany, seed trap, forest monitoring, automated identification, QK1-989, Protocol Note, automated identification; forest monitoring; random forest; seed classification; seed trap, Biology (General), random forest
seed classification, QH301-705.5, Botany, seed trap, forest monitoring, automated identification, QK1-989, Protocol Note, automated identification; forest monitoring; random forest; seed classification; seed trap, Biology (General), random forest
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
