Med‐Arb Agreements since Thione: A Practice Update

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Sep 2015 English Publisher:WileyJournal:Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, volume 33, pages 113-120 (issn: 1549-4373, eissn: 1549-4381,

Copyright policy )

Authors: David J. McLean;

doi: 10.1002/alt.21594

Med‐Arb Agreements since Thione: A Practice Update

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

In 2008, we published an article exploring the potential for federal courts to conclude that mediation and arbitration, or med‐arb, agreements did not qualify as “arbitration” under the Federal Arbitration Act. 9 U.S.C. § 2 (2011). See David J. McLean & Sean‐Patrick Wilson, “Compelling Mediation in the Context Med‐Arb Agreements,” 63 Dispute Resolution Journal 28 (2008)(available at http://ow.ly/Q8Oob).

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average