
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1089
pmid: 29874391
AbstractPremise of The StudyMost dendroecological studies focus on dominant trees, but little is known about the growing season of trees belonging to different size classes and their sensitivity to biotic factors. The objective of this study was to compare the dynamics of xylem formation between dominant and suppressed trees of Abies fabri of similar age growing in the Gongga Mountains, southeastern Tibetan Plateau, and to identify the association between xylem growth and climate.MethodsThe timing and duration of xylogenesis in histological sections were investigated weekly during the 2013–2015 growing seasons.Key ResultsOur investigation found that timing and duration of xylogenesis varied with canopy position and its associated tree size. Xylogenesis started 6–14 days earlier, and ended 5–11 days later in dominant trees than in suppressed trees, resulting in a significantly longer growing season. Dominant trees also exhibited higher temperature sensitivity of tracheid production rate than suppressed trees.ConclusionsThe observed differences in xylogenesis among trees suggested that competition affects tree growth by reducing the growing period in suppressed trees. Representative climate–growth relationships should involve trees of all size classes when evaluating the effects of the environment on forest dynamics.
Foresterie et sciences du bois, China, cambial activity, Climate, Pinaceae, Trees, Biologie et autres sciences connexes, secondary growth, Abies fabri, Xylem, Tibetan Plateau, Seasons, competition, Abies
Foresterie et sciences du bois, China, cambial activity, Climate, Pinaceae, Trees, Biologie et autres sciences connexes, secondary growth, Abies fabri, Xylem, Tibetan Plateau, Seasons, competition, Abies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
