Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Agronomy Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Agronomy Journal
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Optimizing selection of wheat genotypes through simulated individual BLUP and modified simulated individual BLUP

Authors: Caique Machado e Silva; Henrique Caletti Mezzomo; Rodrigo Silva Alves; Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende; Maicon Nardino;

Optimizing selection of wheat genotypes through simulated individual BLUP and modified simulated individual BLUP

Abstract

AbstractThe early stages of wheat breeding programs often contain large number of plants in segregating populations that must be selected. Selecting the best populations and plants in those stages is not an easy task, making it necessary to use robust methodologies that facilitate the selection process. The goals of this work were to evaluate different methods for the selection of individual plants in early wheat breeding stages, compare the efficiency of each method, and suggest the most suitable one for implementation in wheat breeding programs. An experiment with 56 F2 segregant populations derived from a complete diallel, together with eight parents, was conducted and evaluated for grain yield (g pL−1). Analysis of variance and mixed model analysis were applied to obtain the genetic parameters and predict genotypic values. Four selection strategies were designed: mass selection and other three mixed model‐based methods (individual best linear unbiased prediction [BLUPI]; simulated individual best linear unbiased prediction [BLUPIS]; and modified simulated individual best linear unbiased [BLPISM]). The genotypic variability among and within populations allowed the selection of superior genotypes. Simple linear regression analysis and Spearman correlation analysis allowed to conclude that BLUPIS and BLUPISM are equivalent to BLUPI. The BLUPIS and BLUPISM should be used because they easily indicate for the selection of plants in populations with positive genetic effects, dismissing the evaluation of individual plants.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!