
doi: 10.1002/agj2.20382
AbstractRoot morphology and production are important for soil nutrient acquisition and C sequestration, but these traits are poorly understood in the bioenergy crop elephantgrass [Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schum.]. Our objective was to characterize root traits of elephantgrass receiving different nutrient management practices in comparison with bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flüggé) pasture grown in the southeastern U.S. Treatments were bahiagrass + 50 kg N ha−1 (BHG), and elephantgrass receiving either: 50 kg N ha−1 (E50), 50 kg N ha−1 + biochar (E50BC), 50 kg N ha−1 + lignocellulosic fermentation residual (E50FR), or 250 kg N ha−1 (E250). Roots were sampled annually for 4 yr (2013‐2016). Root C and N concentration were measured at termination (2016) of the study. Both crop species exhibited similar root length density (RLD) and root mass density (RMD) across all depths in 2014 and 2015. BHG root diameter was 55% greater than all elephantgrass treatments. By 2016, E50FR increased elephantgrass RLD and RMD in the shallow soil layers (< 0.2 m). Root N content was 15–39% lower for all elephantgrass treatments than BHG in the 0‐0.1 m depth, and 22–25% lower for E50 and E50BC in the 0.1‐ to 0.2‐m depth compared with BHG. Additionally, roots C content was 6% higher in the 0‐0.1 m compared with the 0.1‐ to 0.2‐m soil depth irrespective of treatment. Application of biochar and lignocellulosic fermentation residual as amendments produced a stimulatory effect on elephantgrass root growth in soil shallow layers, which could affect nutrient and water acquisition.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
