
doi: 10.1002/agg2.20461
AbstractSoil organic matter (SOM) and texture are key properties influencing soil nutrient and water dynamics but are time‐consuming procedures for analytical laboratories. Our objective was to evaluate SOM and soil texture predictions using Mehlich‐3 nutrients and pH in Arkansas soils. Particle size was determined by the hydrometer method (2‐ and 8‐h readings) and SOM by loss on ignition. Two datasets were used to calibrate clay and sand (n = 409) and SOM (n = 1019) prediction models using simple and multiple regression. Estimated cation exchange capacity was highly correlated with clay, resulting in significant prediction models alone or combined with phosphorus (P); pH and copper (Cu); or pH, sodium (Na), and Cu (R2 = 0.84, 0.88, 0.89, and 0.90; p < 0.0001, respectively). Soil nutrients were weakly correlated with sand, resulting in a prediction model with moderate accuracy when using Mehlich‐3 P, calcium (Ca), Na, iron (Fe), and manganese (Mn) (R2 = 0.49; p < 0.0001). Clay and sand prediction models presented comparable accuracy when validated on a new dataset (n = 103). Predicted sand and clay showed good accuracy in grouping soils into medium (65%) and fine (96%) textural categories but had limited ability to define the coarse‐textural group (9%). SOM had moderate goodness‐of‐fit statistics for calibration and validation datasets using pH, P, Ca, Na, Mn, and zinc (R2 = 0.65 and 0.70, respectively; p < 0.0001). Mehlich‐3 nutrients can be used to estimate soil texture and assist with crop management decisions, but further research is needed to improve SOM prediction.
Environmental sciences, S, Agriculture, GE1-350
Environmental sciences, S, Agriculture, GE1-350
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
