
doi: 10.1002/2014ja019837
handle: 2381/36523
AbstractWe use 5 years (2001–2005) of CHAMP (Challenging Minisatellite Payload) satellite data to study average spatial and temporal mass density perturbations caused by magnetospheric substorms in the thermosphere. Using statistics from 2306 substorms to construct superposed epoch time series, we find that the largest average increase in mass density of about 6% occurs about 90 min after substorm expansion phase onset about 3 h of magnetic local time east of the onset region. Averaged over the entire polar auroral region, a mass density increase of about 4% is observed. Using a simple model to estimate the mass density increase at the satellite altitude, we find that an energy deposition rate of 30 GW applied for half an hour predominantly at an altitude of 110 km is able to produce mass density enhancements of the same magnitude. When taking into account previous work that has shown that 80% of the total energy input is due to Joule heating, i.e., enhanced electric fields, whereas 20% is due to precipitation of mainly electrons, our results suggest that the average substorm deposits about 6 GW in the polar thermosphere through particle precipitation. Our result is in good agreement with simultaneous measurements of the NOAA Polar‐orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) Hemispheric Power Index; however, it is about 1 order of magnitude less than reported previously.
Science & Technology, 550, GEOSCIENCES, CHAMP OBSERVATIONS, ENERGY INPUT, IMAGE SPACECRAFT, CUSP, UPPER-ATMOSPHERE, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 541, MODEL, AURORAL ELECTRON-PRECIPITATION, Physical Sciences, GLOBAL MHD SIMULATION, FUV, MULTIDISCIPLINARY, MAGNETIC SUBSTORM
Science & Technology, 550, GEOSCIENCES, CHAMP OBSERVATIONS, ENERGY INPUT, IMAGE SPACECRAFT, CUSP, UPPER-ATMOSPHERE, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 541, MODEL, AURORAL ELECTRON-PRECIPITATION, Physical Sciences, GLOBAL MHD SIMULATION, FUV, MULTIDISCIPLINARY, MAGNETIC SUBSTORM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
