
pmid: 947236
BURTON L. Wise1has noted the need to restructure the testimony of expert medical witnesses in courts of law in the United States. The main change proposed is that experts testify as unbiased witnesses reporting to the court, the material to be used by one or both sides as they see fit. This proposal is so obviously reasonable and equitable that it is a wonder it has not been pursued wherever civilization is improving. It is a question with which I have been concerned during my entire career. Shortly after finishing postgraduate training in neurology and psychiatry, I was among those instrumental in founding a local society of neurology and psychiatry. Discomfited by the beating that truth was taking in courts of law, to say nothing of the humiliation of the profession and especially psychiatry in the press, several of us drew up a resolution to embody the very
Attitude, Physicians, Forensic Psychiatry, Expert Testimony, United States
Attitude, Physicians, Forensic Psychiatry, Expert Testimony, United States
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
