
pmid: 5067640
To the Editor— Rix's letter (217:480, 1971) recommending primary nerve repair in combined nerve and tendon lacerations, and the subsequent letters of Raskind et al (217:1864, 1971) and Cramer (219:1213, 1972) presented interesting discussions of the management of peripheral nerve injuries. We are in the process of reviewing data from a serial study 1 of 376 peripheral nerve injuries in 223 patients, and I would like to offer some preliminary observations and theoretical support for Rix's conclusions. Our study was prospective, and included a protocol in which clinical and electromyographic examinations were serially performed. In studying regeneration of motor nerves we found that even in the most successful cases when full clinical strength returned, innervation as determined electromyographically by counting motor units was less than complete. Apparently, following peripheral nerve injury, greater-than-normal numbers of muscle fibers become incorporated in each motor unit, and muscle fibers undergo hypertrophy. Similar studies of
Time Factors, Peripheral Nerve Injuries, Humans, Peripheral Nerves, Prognosis, Nerve Regeneration
Time Factors, Peripheral Nerve Injuries, Humans, Peripheral Nerves, Prognosis, Nerve Regeneration
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
