
arXiv: 0908.1059
This article analyses three methods of remote voting in an uncontrolled environment: postal voting, internet voting and hybrid voting. It breaks down the voting process into different stages and compares their vulnerabilities considering criteria that must be respected in any democratic vote: confidentiality, anonymity, transparency, vote unicity and authenticity. Whether for safety or reliability, each vulnerability is quantified by three parameters: size, visibility and difficulty to achieve. The study concludes that the automatisation of treatments combined with the dematerialisation of the objects used during an election tends to substitute visible vulnerabilities of a lesser magnitude by invisible and widespread vulnerabilities.
15 pages
FOS: Computer and information sciences, democracy, unicity, vote par internet, vote à distance, vers., virus, transparence, worms., [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, Computer Science - Computers and Society, authenticity, fraude, unicité, Computers and Society (cs.CY), ampleur, transparency, anonymity, vote par correspondance postale, démocratie, postal remote voting, vote par correspondance hybride, visibility, remote voting, [INFO.INFO-CY] Computer Science [cs]/Computers and Society [cs.CY], sincérité, worms, Internet voting, visibilité, [INFO.INFO-IR] Computer Science [cs]/Information Retrieval [cs.IR], fraud, anonymat, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science, hybrid remote voting
FOS: Computer and information sciences, democracy, unicity, vote par internet, vote à distance, vers., virus, transparence, worms., [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, Computer Science - Computers and Society, authenticity, fraude, unicité, Computers and Society (cs.CY), ampleur, transparency, anonymity, vote par correspondance postale, démocratie, postal remote voting, vote par correspondance hybride, visibility, remote voting, [INFO.INFO-CY] Computer Science [cs]/Computers and Society [cs.CY], sincérité, worms, Internet voting, visibilité, [INFO.INFO-IR] Computer Science [cs]/Information Retrieval [cs.IR], fraud, anonymat, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science, hybrid remote voting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
