Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Scientific Electroni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Actividad insecticida de extractos vegetales sobre Rhodnius prolixus y Rhodnius pallescens (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

Authors: Parra-Henao, Gabriel; Garcia Pajón, Carlos Mario; Cotes Torres, José Miguel;

Actividad insecticida de extractos vegetales sobre Rhodnius prolixus y Rhodnius pallescens (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

Abstract

Se realizaron bioensayos con los extractos etanólicos de las especies vegetales Annona muricata, Mammea americana, Melia azedarach, Ricinus communis y los insecticidas nicotina y deltametrina sobre ninfas y huevos de R. prolixus y R. pallescens. Se determinó la toxicidad, repelencia y actividad ovicida. Los valores mas bajos de CL50 expresados en %p/p obtenidos respectivamente para R. prolixus y R. pallescens fueron: A. muricata 1,02 y 1,74; M. azedarach 1,77 y 1,74. El extracto de M. americana presentó menor actividad insecticida sobre las dos especies de triatominos: CL50 4,33 y 2,61. La repelencia osciló entre 51 y 58% y la eclosión de los huevos fue inhibida entre 10 y 25%. Los resultados de toxicidad se consideran poco promisorios por ser superiores a la concentración máxima de 5.000 ppm recomendada por la GTZ. Extracts from vegetal species Annona muricata, Mammea americana, Melia azedarach, Ricinus communis and the insecticides nicotine and delthametrin were tested for repellent, ovicidal and insecticidal properties against eggs and nymphs of Rhodnius prolixus and R. pallescens. The lowest values of LC50 in %W/W to R. prolixus and R. pallescens was: A. muricata 1.02 - 1.74 and M. azedarach 1.77 - 1.74. The extract of M. americana had a weaker effect on the triatominae species LC50 4.33 and 2.61. Repellency fluctuated between 51- 58% and hatching was inhibited between 10- 25%. Toxicity tests were considered less promising as being above the maximum concentration recommended by GTZ.

Keywords

Insecticidas Botánicos, botanical, Chagas disease, Enfermedad de Chagas, Rhodnius, vector control, Colombia, insecticides

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green