
The article concerns not «objectively» existing, but imagined society of liberal intellectuals (from the 1840s westerners to the cadets and Octobrists of the beginning of the XXth century), which shaped the understanding of the collective identity of this society and Russian society as well. Russian intellectuals instrumentalized the concepts «progress» and «backwardness», «civility» and «ignorance», resulting in hierarchy development, where «shapers» of the collective identities placed themselves as intermediaries between the state and the society. Russian liberally-minded historians played an important role in this process, as far as it was these historians who possessed an overwhelming power in Europe in the XIXth century the power to tell the state and the societies about their past, present and future and became the professional creators of (national) identities. And here their expertise and ideological clichés were intricately combined. The key questions of the article are to what extent and where reality shaping of Russian intellectuals (members of intelligentsia) was close to that of the intellectuals in other European regions and what specific features of their discourse work are.
Речь идет о воображаемом сообществе либеральных интеллектуалов (от западников 1840-х гг. до кадетов и октябристов начала ХХ в.), которое конструировало представления о коллективной идентичности собственной группы и российского общества. Центральный вопрос статьи состоит в том, насколько и в чем конструирование реальности российскими интеллектуалами (интеллигентами) совпадало с действиями интеллектуалов других европейских регионов, а в чем их дискурсивная работа имела специфические черты.
ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЕ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЫ, РОССИЙСКИЙ ЛИБЕРАЛИЗМ, КУЛЬТУРА, ОТСТАЛОСТЬ
ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЕ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЫ, РОССИЙСКИЙ ЛИБЕРАЛИЗМ, КУЛЬТУРА, ОТСТАЛОСТЬ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
