Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10902/15697
The assessment of the environmental greenness in the process industry has been quantified by means of the development of an integrated index, i.e., Monetized Footprint Index (MFI), based on the compilation and the integration of land, water and carbon footprint indicators. The MFI has been applied to assess the case study of a seawater reverse osmosis desalination with an integrated electrodialysis with bipolar membranes brine treatment. The MFI enables the evaluation of environmental burdens related to the chosen functional unit based on a weighting procedure, which integers land, water, and CO2 prices. It is neither a tool for the calculation of the production cost nor a sustainability analysis tool as it does not include social or economic indicators. Comparison between selected scenarios, based on the different sources of the requested electricity, grid mix (Spain and Israel, as examples), and photovoltaic solar energy (under a fixed solar irradiation), has been carried out. Maximum values of 0.30 €·m–3 and minimum values of 0.11 €·m–3 for the different scenarios have been obtained in the calculation of the MFI. Moreover, uncertainties in land, water and CO2 prices have been analyzed under a Monte Carlo simulation. This study concludes that MFI, being based on well-known environmental footprint indicators, can simplify and support the decision-making process.
Support from MICINN under project CTM2014-57833-R is acknowledged. M.H.-G. thanks the MICINN for FPI grant BES-2015-07350 and the Erasmus+ program for the Student Mobility KA107 grant.
Brines, Desalination, Water footprint (WF), Seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO), Carbon footprint (CF), Land footprint (LF), Monetized footprint index (MFI), Electrodialysis with bipolar membranes (EDBM)
Brines, Desalination, Water footprint (WF), Seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO), Carbon footprint (CF), Land footprint (LF), Monetized footprint index (MFI), Electrodialysis with bipolar membranes (EDBM)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 189 | |
| downloads | 98 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts