
Undergraduate students enrol at university with diverse levels of prior knowledge and intuitive conceptions about essential biological topics. This longitudinal study explored the development of a conceptual understanding about three topics and how domain-specific prior knowledge affects this development. Undergraduate students (N = 50) of biological and environmental sciences participated in three measurement points – baseline (2019), follow-up 1 (2020), and follow-up 2 (2021) – where the same questionnaire with open-ended tasks was given. A mixed-methods approach was used for quantitative scoring of the answers and qualitative thematic analysis to describe the development of individual students’ conceptual understanding. The effect of prior knowledge was studied by dividing the students into two groups based on the baseline performance. The topic of evolution showed the most significant differences in prior knowledge and in knowledge gains. Students with lower prior knowledge experienced desirable shifts in their explanatory models about evolutionary processes, but an equal amount exhibited fragmented learning trajectories. Students with a more robust prior understanding of such an emergent phenomenon can more likely integrate scientific concepts in their knowledge framework. Implications for teaching in higher education are discussed.
Educational sciences, Biology education, Conceptual change, Longitudinal study, Prior knowledge
Educational sciences, Biology education, Conceptual change, Longitudinal study, Prior knowledge
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
